Professional Essay Writers

Sample of Letter to Public Official

The issue of raising the eligibility age for Medicare or Social Security is a contentious issue and I want you to vote againstit. While acknowledging the counter objection, I want to indicate to you why you should take my stand and vote against this particular issue.

Meet Our Writers

Assessing the existing policy, I must say that it is adequate as it acknowledges that America faces budget problems, in addition to, the fact that the American citizens are living together. As such, the current policy can be said to cater for the long run interests of the public. The problems that this country face coupled with the fact that we tend to live together should convince you that raising the Medicare eligibility age is not at a viable idea(Wittenburget  al. 17). When they were introduced, Medicare, as well as, social security were intended for those Americans who had already retired. As such, setting the normal eligibility age for both programs at the age that America as a nation has decided that retirement typically begins makes sense. Again, given that it is those who are working who generate the money necessary to pay benefits, it is essential for the eligibility age to be set where the number of years Americans work is enough to settle retirement benefits.

As you know, citizens of America live longer. As such, the country has gradually raised the normal age for social security benefits from the age of 65 to the age of 67. Here, I would tend to argue the age will be raised up to 70 in the next twenty or so years, which is not a viable idea as it sounds (Wittenburget  al. 19).

But the eligibility age of Medicare has not kept up. Indeed, the citizens of America become members of the program at the age of 65, notwithstanding the fact that there is an expectation that an American citizen reaching the age of 65 these days can live further twenty years. With more and more American citizens living together, and the spending on health of older citizens on an increase, I would argue that America cannot afford Medicare at the age above 65.I would also argue that, rather than raise the age abruptly, it would be sensible to increase the eligibility age gradually over the next ten or even fifteen years to reach at least 67, which is the Social Security normal age of retirement, and for the eligibility age of both Medicare and Social Security programs to rise in a gradual manner after that as American Citizens continue living together.

I am also going to argue strongly against raising the eligibility age of both programs spending and revenues of America. As such, raising the eligibility ages would lead to a reduced federal spending while increasing the federal revenues by inducing the American citizens to work longer. According to the findings by the CBO, raising the eligibility age of the Medicare from the age of 65 to 67 would lead to a reduced Medicare spending by a significant 5 percent. This would not favor the beneficiaries as their access to Medicare would be delayed and many of the affected citizens would be forced to pay more for health care (C.B.O par. 1). Similarly, raising the full retirement age for the Social Security program from the age of 67 to 70 would lead to a reduced Social Security spending of a whooping 13%. As a result, the American citizens would face reduced benefits over a lifetime.

Here, I must acknowledge other people views that seem to support the raising the eligibility age for Medicare or Social Security. Most of them argue that by inducing the Americans to work longer, raising the ages of eligibility for both programs would lead to an increase in the size of the workforce, in addition to the economy. According to the CBO, in the long terms, raising the eligibility of Social Security to the age of 64 or the full retirement age to 70, it would boost the size of the workforce. Similarly, rising the eligibility age of the Medicare program to the age of 67 would lead to an increased size of the workforce, as well as, the economy (C.B.O par. 2). For instance, hey argue that a rise in the early eligibility age of Social Security from the age of 62 to the age of 64 would cause an insignificant change on the Social security spending. They say that this would cause a delay in accessing Social Security benefits. According to proposers, this is not decisive as they will still access those benefits. The most salient thing here is that their monthly amounts of benefits would increase.

In response to the proposers’ advancements, I think what matters most is the beneficiaries. Since they are the ones who contribute to the programs, delaying access does not seem to go in accordance with their interests. Why delay access, yet they are the principle stakeholders? On the issue of increase of the size of workforce and economy, again I will argue that this is not worthwhile. According to the findings by CBO, raising the eligibility age of the Social Security program would raise the economy and the size of the workforce by slightly more that 1% (C.B.O par. 4). The case of raising the eligibility age of Medicare is even more insignificant as it raise the economy and the workforce by less than 1%. Rather than increasing the size of labor force this way, the rate of unemployment in America is significant. The government should seek to employ them. Indeed, the unemployed should be the ones to increase the workforce. Again, rather than having an ageing workforce, the eligibility age should not be increased so as to pave way for new entrants.


Works Cited

C.B.O (2012).Raising the Ages of Eligibility for Medicare and Social Security. 10Jan. 2008. Web.3Nov. 2012.http://www.cbo.gov/publication/42683

Wittenburg, David, David Stapleton, and Scott Scrivner.“How Raising the Age of Eligibility for Social Security and Medicare Might Affect the Disability Insurance and Medicare Programs.” Security Bulletin, 63.4 (2000).17-25.